The Supreme Court and the Supreme Arbitration Court can be integrated

By data оf the Russian legal and judicial information agency of June 21, 2013, the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin suggested to unite the Supreme Court and the Supreme Arbitration Court and make corresponding changes to the Constitution.

“I suggest to unite the Russian Federation Supreme Court and the Supreme Arbitration Court for what it will be necessary to make amendments to the Constitution”, — Putin told, speaking at plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum.

According to the president, the court’s association will allow to provide common approaches to settlement of disputes with participation as individuals, and the organizations, and also with public authorities and local government. At the same time, he emphasized, “it’s a serious question, it’s necessary to think over and weigh everything carefully “.

According to Kirill Vozisov, the question about court association had ripened for a long time and demands, on the one hand, immediate, and with another — careful and detailed work. In practice positions of two highest representatives of judicial authority repeatedly differ.

So, lawyers of Inmar Legal Ltd. are involving now in dispute (See Inmar news for  October 26, 2012 “Kirill Vozisov commented for Deita.ru situation round shareholders on Komarova, 45”) on which the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation accurately formulated the “Obligation and legal” position: “The property right of the person who signed the contract with the builder, for an immovable thing, arises only from the moment of entering into Unified State Register of Rights of note about it. Where there are no rights, can’t be and the claim about its recognition”. Courts of the general jurisdiction apply the “Proprietary” concept of the rights of investors on a construction object. Where there are no rights, can’t be the claim about its recognition”.

Courts of the general jurisdiction apply the “Proprietary” concept of the investor’s rights on a construction object.
Moreover, all know that Resolutions of the Russian Federation Supreme Arbitration Court are rejected in practice by federal judges for an explanation of these or those legal questions that is often inexplicable complicates work and leads to illogical and inconsistent decisions.
Similar examples, however, to a lesser extent can be observed in Arbitration.

In more detail: RAPSI